Forgive me my trespasses

It’s bad enough to be rejected. My short story didn’t win the Toronto Star competition. I console myself with the belief it's more of a train-of-thought monologue, than a traditional story. Fair enough. But mishaps that remove you from the competition altogether are worse. In this case I had only myself to blame although I’ve spent the last two days identifying who and what else might shoulder that burden.

Friday sucked.

Surely I could find a better word but what comes to mind is ruder and even less explicative. I found an Ontario Arts Council (OAC) package in the mailbox. It was too early for a decision but as I ripped it open I couldn’t help but feel a little excited. My manuscript was included. When last I’d been rejected there’d been no manuscript.

We received your application to the Friday February 15, 2012 deadline of the Writer’s Works in Progress program. However, your application is ineligible because you identified yourself as the author on the second page of the project outline in each copy of the manuscript.

I reread it three times then turned to the offending document. My name was right there, in the header of the project description. Crying, I ran and got white-out and, like it would fix anything or make me suddenly eligible again, I blanked myself out.

So now I get to put into action the theoretical comfort of complaining I wrote about last week.

I’m someone who needs a repository for frustration. I understand punching and kicking things. I threw a tin cup across the kitchen a few months ago, don’t remember what for, and chipped a piece off my new counter top. It should be a lesson. Disappointments and fuck-ups too often result in broken hands, toes, glasses and counters. Why do I withhold forgiveness, refuse myself tenderness when things go wrong? I'd feel terrible if it happened to someone else. Why is my response to heap injury on top of insult?

Blaming technology, while necessary, brings little satisfaction. There are no apologizes.  No responsibility is taken. I do it anyway. What’s with the header? Why was my name  on page 2 but not on page 1? It’s a fucking header. It’s meant to do the work for you, so you don’t have to type it on the top of each page.

I know. You have to check it. I thought I did.

Next.  What do the grants administrators get paid for? Don’t they look at this shit before sending it out to the jury? I was a government grants person for years. That was the job, to review all the applications before they went forward.

It’s my fault, it’s my fault, it’s my fault. I knoooooooooow. And my guess is someone at OAC feels really bad about missing it. They’re busy. They get 100s of these things. I’ll get over it. I can submit for the next deadline. But I’m feeling awfully sad. So sad I had to use the same sad photo for a second time.

I'd like to think it’s better to bang out a blog post than break something but they're not always mutually exclusive.

Comments

Okay, so Aviva, that is completely and utterly fucked on their part. Seriously, it's a god damn disgrace that not one fucking clerk could just go that teesy weensy bit extra and white out your name and then photocopy it or at the very very least, give you an opportunity to fix it and email it in like, what, five fucking minutes??? It is a tragic and all too real commentary that if you work for a gov't agency, there is no "extra mile", there is only the Borg like assimilatative misery...is assimilatative a word?? I would like to slap someone in the face on your behalf, (metaphorically of course), as I am a paci(fist) ;).... hate them, love your talent...effin effers! Keep on Truckin' fuckers!

Pages

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This is to check for spam.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.